I believe the number of people who avoid playing an event because it might mean playing against a multi-player are very few. In addition, I believe there are many reasons an event round might go long that have nothing to do with people playing in multi-events. And the multi-players probably outnumber them
Therefore it's actually in the best interest of WoTC (who get more money with more participation) and especially those formats who struggle to get nubmer to have multi-play available.
That being said, if I play a person whom I can tell is multi-playing, I immediately try and figure out who & where they are playing and make every effort to make it hard for them to do so. In the future I think I'll contact whomever they are playing in the other tournament (if possible) and simply make life miserable for them by coordinated effort - because there is nothting wrong with using your clock, right? :)
I tried the WR Skyfisher deck but with other aproach. I focused on landfall and recurring Teetering Peaks. The last version I played was something like this (I tinkered with it a lot so its for sure not a perfect decklist but it shows the idea):
Burn:
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Incinerate
Lightning Bolts are obvious, used incinerate because of instant speed with helps a lot against combo. The idea is to make them 6-7 life in first 3 turns, and then when they cast sign in bloods burn them. Probably a better player won't fall for this, but it worked amazingly good in tournament practice :)
4 Reckless Charge
As you said why play with four brushwhacker's when you can play twelve. Very underrated card, 6 damage in 4 mana + 2 creatures gain haste can be really unfair. Even if you don't want to play it main, try sideboarding - it's perfect for combo decks that don't disturbe you.
4 Steppe Lynx
4 Plated Geopede
The landfall guys. To be fair, they don't work so good.
4 Goblin Bushwhacker
4 Kor Skyfisher
Nothing to explain.
3 Keldon Marauders
3 Skyknight Legionnaire
These are the free slots. Marauders are awesome with Skyfisher. Legionnaire was being tested - it turned out not to be so good as I thought earlier.
3 Lotus Petal
4 Manamorphose
Petals as I test them lately should be natural inclusion in any beatdown nowadays. They also help you to put your skyfisher second turn without tempo loss.
Manamorphose is just an interesting proposition. Would you play a card that reads "instant, if you have 2 lands in play you may play it for free, draw a card"? And it sometimes cures you out of screw. Surely it can be countered, but most of people won't counter it and counters aren't played so much lately. It essentialy makes your deck 56 cards instead of 60.
Teetering peaks are really nice with skyfishers, try them. Mana base is made for the landfall, and it's not good. Don't look at it ;P
And another idea for this deck is to go green, take some good beatdown creatures, and use horned kavu instead of skyfishers. As for your deck I wouldn't use lions - they really suck.
"WE" Don't have to do anything. I don't care how many events people enter as I stated several times above. I do care if you waste my time however. What I can do about it on the other hand is extremely limited. Also this isn't kibitzing, this is kvetching. When I watch your matches and tell you what you are doing wrong while you do them, that's kibitzing.
Actually I was just saying you could be called on for being rude here which is an irony. Despite that you made some points.
1) Not sure discussing rudeness equates to imposing beliefs. If it did then we would live in a fascist world, and last I checked we don't, despite the media.
2) IMHO the replays are quasi* unethical and I really have trouble with the fact that WOTC not only allowed them to be used in tourney (Scouting) but seems to encourage them. But that is a different issue unrelated to player behavior.
Again like rudeness you are allowed the choice and no one else can tell you (and make it stick) that it is wrong to do so.
It is also not against the rules to be rude tacitly (being actively rude is a CoC violation of course). No one (sane) is saying you can't do either.
If you want to talk opinions: Mine is that if you are rude people will respond accordingly. Anyone can be an asshat if they have the desire and know how.
And what is wrong with someone at least showing minimal courtesy with a canned macro that takes a split second to do if you have the presence of mind? Again no one forces anyone to do anything they don't want to but the water is there if the horse wants to drink it. And why wouldn't the horse want to drink it? Because someone else told them to? That's just rebelliousness without a cause.
In the casual room, I respond to the lack of a hello (particularly as a response to "hello :)" as a sign that the person IS an asshat and generally block them at the end of the game (assuming no chat at all from them) so I don't end up running into them again. MY choice.
Sometimes I am wrong and if I see that I change my view point.
In limited play my take is a little different. People who play limited tend to by and large concentrate and focus only on play and avoid the social interactions possible in the game. I don't expect much at all from limited players though some are extremely nice. Many aren't. Some are actively rude and deserve whatever the ORCs throw at them. That again is a different story.
As far as what else can be griped about? Are you serious? People gripe about EVERYTHING. Including complaining. Calling complainers whiners for example is a common sport in casual chat. Whatever it takes to belittle and degrade those who disagree, right? Win at all costs!
*(Quasi only because good players will take any advantage regardless of ethical considerations and because of that WOTC should know better. And Since they do presumably know better I must be at least partially wrong here since it is not only condoned but encouraged.)
Actually it has been proven that even with a hands-free device, your reaction times are significantly reduced while trying to do both tasks at the same time...
C'mon guys, do we need to exhume Mr. Rodgers and all get matching sweaters? Paul this isn't a couch! Who the F#$% cares how many events people enter, as D.S. said, it's the opps advantage as he's more likely to time out. Is it irritating? - duh...so is getting mana screwed and about a kazillion other things. Game on and lets all stop kibitzing.
I think LD/Counters/Inevitable decks tend to be seen as not casual by those who dislike them. (cf: "There is no casual" debate) That isn't necessarily the same thing as deliberate rudeness. People know it is pot luck in casual. On the other hand if someone objects to a deck I have built because of a few disruptive or unfun cards I will switch decks.
Ok your initial post seemed very out there and in our faces. "Im rude and I don't care!" but if what you meant is people think you are being rude that is a different take. I don't agree with your position, though I imagine you are a fast enough player that YOU usually aren't being rude to your opponent you stand as a role model for lesser players who will not plan out their multitasking with such ease and rapidity. Yes the downside is sometimes that the multieventer loses on time or just from broken concentration, but I suspect people who think they are good enough to multievent probably are better than the average player.
Really it doesn't bother me if I know what is going on. What does bother me is dead silence for 9 mins then a flurry of activity. Completely breaks the whole flow as Menace mentioned above and makes the games unfun.
I wouldn't say I'm rude ( even if that sounded so ). My point of view is just that you should plan some time for your match, usually approx 30 minutes. If I play multiple games and still end it in that time anything should be cool, otherwise yeah, might be annoying. But games aren't really that intense and fast most of the time. And never forget, multitabling makes me more likely to time out ( not that this ever happened to me, sometimes I'm still faster than my opp who obv just plays 1 match ).
My whole reply was rude. I am an avid voice for all the mulit event players;p and we say "hell no we won't go"! One should not expect someone to consider his opponent's time constraints or impatience in a timed structured game, esp so when both parties have seperate needs,wants and interests.
Take Dunkle for example, he needs to accumulate as many points as he can(his desire and purpose of participating) and i just want my list posted. Does it not make me rude to impose my belief of rude on him, when the guy is just a squirrle trying to get as many nuts? What is so rude about having him take 9 mins to start the match and 5 mins to make a play-what if it were a young child or a retard-? There are times when this does get annoying and takes you out of your flow, but mostly it does not get to me.
I do not play in multi events due to mostly my dimwittedness, I however do take long pauses before starts of matches to watch all the replays. What else can you gripe of next? Maybe demand that the player HAS to MUST or DIE, macro "Hello and good luck" and " Good Game"?
Would it be safe to say the majority of the magic community finds land destruction/discard/counters to be rude? We all know the casual room does. Does this necessarily make them right (Devil's advocate here).
I agree that playing in multiple event is probably not common courtesy. The problem is that often times ppl playing in multiple events still come in well below the timeclock, when in fact playing against a CB/Top lock might find it's clock at the same time when that player isn't playing in multiple events.
While this isn't paper magic, I think playing in multiple events online shouldn't be allowed because it's physically impossible in Magic:Pants. You simply can't be two places at once.
I don't play in multiple events because 1) I find I make mistakes 2)I think it does venture into the gray area of having courtesy for other peoples' time.
The only time I usually play multiple is when I am finishing up a 2man and my draft starts. That is usually only for a short time though.
Your whole reply could be taken as rude. :) That said what we are referencing is not how you use your time but how you make people wait who came to have fun and play. If you can manage 3 games at once without being rude more power to you. On the other hand 99.9% of people can not. I only object to being left hanging while the superior player isn't even thinking about the move but merely playing other moves in other games. I agree you are within your rights to do so, but that doesn't make it RIGHT. :) If you see the difference. As a consumer we are entitled to do whatever it is we pay for but as civilians (those who are civil) it is incumbent on us to be courteous to those we play with.
I don't know Dunkle so I will take your word for his character though I bet since you do know him you are biased. ;p But he admitted he is rude...did he mean to say he isn't rude but others mistakenly think so? That sounds odd. I do know he is a damned fine player and has posted some interesting comments here so this isn't a knock on him. I just find it interesting that he admits to being rude and then says "I don't care." which reinforces this idea which you say is erroneous.
As for myself I try to extend courtesy to all, but I will speak my mind. If you think that is rude so be it. I will say this: People can be 'nice' and have evil agendas and people can be nasty and still be of a benevolent mindset, so rudeness is not the be all indicator of good and evil. (Thank goodness.) On the other hand if rude behavior is because of poor values then well may be it is a symptom of a larger problem.
Also I would say your perspective is a bit funny. If someone complains about someone else's behavior in a game (such as magic online) this does not indicate that they don't know what real problems are. I mean I don't know a single person irl who doesn't have real problems. That is the nature of life. Saying that rude behavior in a game should be tolerated because it isn't on the same scale as say losing a best friend, family member to cancer/accidents etc is just silly.
Rudeness is a societal concept. If you show up a half-hour late to dinner in one society it might be considered rude, whereas in another it might be considered polite. Rudeness is not intrinsic to the act, but rather the cultural expectations. So, for now, if (big 'if') a majority of the MTGO people consider an action rude, that kind of makes it rude by definition. It doesn't matter if you consider yourself enlightened and above a seemingly stupid expectation. Of course, as things stand, their only power is to shun what they consider rude players, meanwhile lobbying to WotC for further action. In the meantime, the activity in question and the labelling of the activity as rude will persist.
One other aspect of good manners though. Even if you know an activity will strike some people as rude, but you think it is not, if you can reasonably get by without doing that activity, it would be considerate of others to avoid it. Consideration of others is a fine quality of a gentleman, and even sacrificing truth to this aspect of charity is often worthwhile. I hold that up as an ideal, although I know not everyone will do so.
Anyways, please forgive my slow play - it's not due to playing multiple events, but rather that I am slow and stupid in coming up with my decisions for a given play sequence.
Playing in multiple events is rude???
You guys serious? Who the F$%# are you to tell me what i may do in events with timers? Like really i wish WotC would impose a cap on some of the ideas poeple spew out of their mouths. You have your TIMER i have mine. There is no rule,clause,law etc stating that i must click the "ok" button. If i do not then i lose and you lost some time(heaven forbid an extra 10 mins)-you guys need some RL problems, This is a joke-
If the timer does not expire, i am within my rights to play in as many as i damm well please. And if my timer does expire, well you just won a round! Gross topic.
The person whom compared driving while on the phone to playing in many events at once, is not the same at all. One is a dangerous task which can not be, in most cases performed by say an 8 year old. That and It is not the talking, rather it is the handling of the moblie device hence hands free phones-headsets- are legal while driving.
Polymorph and Summoning Trap.dek does look promising in RoE that and Jund has to rotate sometime.
Oh and Dunkle is not rude(actually one of the nicest people online whom is also a really good card slinger), Pual, you are;p.
Playing in more than one event at a time is analagous to driving and talking on your cellphone at the same time. You may think you can concentrate on both tasks, but you really cannot fully concentrate on either.
there was an article on starcity about how polymorph could be a much better deck in std once RoE is online, I'm sure people probably saw that as an opportunity, tho a stupid one since it's reprinted in so many sets I can't imagine it ever being a money card
Dunno...I got 4. On the advice of Mr Impy I might add. There are plenty in the story though. 38 or so between 3 sets. It was just the way cheap ones that disappeared I think.
Where all the Polymorphs at? Almost like someone's been buying a lot of them, more than one would ever need, with the idea that it would suddenly shoot up in price.
I like playing 2 or even 3 events at once. I don't feel a difference in concentration between 1 and 2 events, though 3 simultanous are really hard work. And yeah, I don't care if people think Im rude as Im usually fast enough to end it in time. Plus, I play fast decks.
Multi-tabling on Magic Online is incredibly rude, and I wish Wizards would impose a cap of one sanctioned event at a time.
"Hey, other people in this event! I'm going to deliberately waste your time and I don't give a crap! Here, stare at this image of an extended middle finger while I play in another game for a bit!"
I believe the number of people who avoid playing an event because it might mean playing against a multi-player are very few. In addition, I believe there are many reasons an event round might go long that have nothing to do with people playing in multi-events. And the multi-players probably outnumber them
Therefore it's actually in the best interest of WoTC (who get more money with more participation) and especially those formats who struggle to get nubmer to have multi-play available.
That being said, if I play a person whom I can tell is multi-playing, I immediately try and figure out who & where they are playing and make every effort to make it hard for them to do so. In the future I think I'll contact whomever they are playing in the other tournament (if possible) and simply make life miserable for them by coordinated effort - because there is nothting wrong with using your clock, right? :)
I tried the WR Skyfisher deck but with other aproach. I focused on landfall and recurring Teetering Peaks. The last version I played was something like this (I tinkered with it a lot so its for sure not a perfect decklist but it shows the idea):
Burn:
4 Lightning Bolt
4 Incinerate
Lightning Bolts are obvious, used incinerate because of instant speed with helps a lot against combo. The idea is to make them 6-7 life in first 3 turns, and then when they cast sign in bloods burn them. Probably a better player won't fall for this, but it worked amazingly good in tournament practice :)
4 Reckless Charge
As you said why play with four brushwhacker's when you can play twelve. Very underrated card, 6 damage in 4 mana + 2 creatures gain haste can be really unfair. Even if you don't want to play it main, try sideboarding - it's perfect for combo decks that don't disturbe you.
4 Steppe Lynx
4 Plated Geopede
The landfall guys. To be fair, they don't work so good.
4 Goblin Bushwhacker
4 Kor Skyfisher
Nothing to explain.
3 Keldon Marauders
3 Skyknight Legionnaire
These are the free slots. Marauders are awesome with Skyfisher. Legionnaire was being tested - it turned out not to be so good as I thought earlier.
3 Lotus Petal
4 Manamorphose
Petals as I test them lately should be natural inclusion in any beatdown nowadays. They also help you to put your skyfisher second turn without tempo loss.
Manamorphose is just an interesting proposition. Would you play a card that reads "instant, if you have 2 lands in play you may play it for free, draw a card"? And it sometimes cures you out of screw. Surely it can be countered, but most of people won't counter it and counters aren't played so much lately. It essentialy makes your deck 56 cards instead of 60.
4 Terramorphic Expanse
4 Mountain
6 Plains
2 Boros Garrison
3 Teetering Peaks
Teetering peaks are really nice with skyfishers, try them. Mana base is made for the landfall, and it's not good. Don't look at it ;P
And another idea for this deck is to go green, take some good beatdown creatures, and use horned kavu instead of skyfishers. As for your deck I wouldn't use lions - they really suck.
sorry, if you have those cards, Ihaven't playered online for about two years now. And perhaps it isn't as competitive, but it still works quite well.
"WE" Don't have to do anything. I don't care how many events people enter as I stated several times above. I do care if you waste my time however. What I can do about it on the other hand is extremely limited. Also this isn't kibitzing, this is kvetching. When I watch your matches and tell you what you are doing wrong while you do them, that's kibitzing.
Actually I was just saying you could be called on for being rude here which is an irony. Despite that you made some points.
1) Not sure discussing rudeness equates to imposing beliefs. If it did then we would live in a fascist world, and last I checked we don't, despite the media.
2) IMHO the replays are quasi* unethical and I really have trouble with the fact that WOTC not only allowed them to be used in tourney (Scouting) but seems to encourage them. But that is a different issue unrelated to player behavior.
Again like rudeness you are allowed the choice and no one else can tell you (and make it stick) that it is wrong to do so.
It is also not against the rules to be rude tacitly (being actively rude is a CoC violation of course). No one (sane) is saying you can't do either.
If you want to talk opinions: Mine is that if you are rude people will respond accordingly. Anyone can be an asshat if they have the desire and know how.
And what is wrong with someone at least showing minimal courtesy with a canned macro that takes a split second to do if you have the presence of mind? Again no one forces anyone to do anything they don't want to but the water is there if the horse wants to drink it. And why wouldn't the horse want to drink it? Because someone else told them to? That's just rebelliousness without a cause.
In the casual room, I respond to the lack of a hello (particularly as a response to "hello :)" as a sign that the person IS an asshat and generally block them at the end of the game (assuming no chat at all from them) so I don't end up running into them again. MY choice.
Sometimes I am wrong and if I see that I change my view point.
In limited play my take is a little different. People who play limited tend to by and large concentrate and focus only on play and avoid the social interactions possible in the game. I don't expect much at all from limited players though some are extremely nice. Many aren't. Some are actively rude and deserve whatever the ORCs throw at them. That again is a different story.
As far as what else can be griped about? Are you serious? People gripe about EVERYTHING. Including complaining. Calling complainers whiners for example is a common sport in casual chat. Whatever it takes to belittle and degrade those who disagree, right? Win at all costs!
*(Quasi only because good players will take any advantage regardless of ethical considerations and because of that WOTC should know better. And Since they do presumably know better I must be at least partially wrong here since it is not only condoned but encouraged.)
Actually it has been proven that even with a hands-free device, your reaction times are significantly reduced while trying to do both tasks at the same time...
C'mon guys, do we need to exhume Mr. Rodgers and all get matching sweaters? Paul this isn't a couch! Who the F#$% cares how many events people enter, as D.S. said, it's the opps advantage as he's more likely to time out. Is it irritating? - duh...so is getting mana screwed and about a kazillion other things. Game on and lets all stop kibitzing.
I think LD/Counters/Inevitable decks tend to be seen as not casual by those who dislike them. (cf: "There is no casual" debate) That isn't necessarily the same thing as deliberate rudeness. People know it is pot luck in casual. On the other hand if someone objects to a deck I have built because of a few disruptive or unfun cards I will switch decks.
Ok your initial post seemed very out there and in our faces. "Im rude and I don't care!" but if what you meant is people think you are being rude that is a different take. I don't agree with your position, though I imagine you are a fast enough player that YOU usually aren't being rude to your opponent you stand as a role model for lesser players who will not plan out their multitasking with such ease and rapidity. Yes the downside is sometimes that the multieventer loses on time or just from broken concentration, but I suspect people who think they are good enough to multievent probably are better than the average player.
Really it doesn't bother me if I know what is going on. What does bother me is dead silence for 9 mins then a flurry of activity. Completely breaks the whole flow as Menace mentioned above and makes the games unfun.
I wouldn't say I'm rude ( even if that sounded so ). My point of view is just that you should plan some time for your match, usually approx 30 minutes. If I play multiple games and still end it in that time anything should be cool, otherwise yeah, might be annoying. But games aren't really that intense and fast most of the time. And never forget, multitabling makes me more likely to time out ( not that this ever happened to me, sometimes I'm still faster than my opp who obv just plays 1 match ).
My whole reply was rude. I am an avid voice for all the mulit event players;p and we say "hell no we won't go"! One should not expect someone to consider his opponent's time constraints or impatience in a timed structured game, esp so when both parties have seperate needs,wants and interests.
Take Dunkle for example, he needs to accumulate as many points as he can(his desire and purpose of participating) and i just want my list posted. Does it not make me rude to impose my belief of rude on him, when the guy is just a squirrle trying to get as many nuts? What is so rude about having him take 9 mins to start the match and 5 mins to make a play-what if it were a young child or a retard-? There are times when this does get annoying and takes you out of your flow, but mostly it does not get to me.
I do not play in multi events due to mostly my dimwittedness, I however do take long pauses before starts of matches to watch all the replays. What else can you gripe of next? Maybe demand that the player HAS to MUST or DIE, macro "Hello and good luck" and " Good Game"?
Would it be safe to say the majority of the magic community finds land destruction/discard/counters to be rude? We all know the casual room does. Does this necessarily make them right (Devil's advocate here).
I agree that playing in multiple event is probably not common courtesy. The problem is that often times ppl playing in multiple events still come in well below the timeclock, when in fact playing against a CB/Top lock might find it's clock at the same time when that player isn't playing in multiple events.
While this isn't paper magic, I think playing in multiple events online shouldn't be allowed because it's physically impossible in Magic:Pants. You simply can't be two places at once.
I don't play in multiple events because 1) I find I make mistakes 2)I think it does venture into the gray area of having courtesy for other peoples' time.
The only time I usually play multiple is when I am finishing up a 2man and my draft starts. That is usually only for a short time though.
Me too. Thinking is not overrated. And well said.
Your whole reply could be taken as rude. :) That said what we are referencing is not how you use your time but how you make people wait who came to have fun and play. If you can manage 3 games at once without being rude more power to you. On the other hand 99.9% of people can not. I only object to being left hanging while the superior player isn't even thinking about the move but merely playing other moves in other games. I agree you are within your rights to do so, but that doesn't make it RIGHT. :) If you see the difference. As a consumer we are entitled to do whatever it is we pay for but as civilians (those who are civil) it is incumbent on us to be courteous to those we play with.
I don't know Dunkle so I will take your word for his character though I bet since you do know him you are biased. ;p But he admitted he is rude...did he mean to say he isn't rude but others mistakenly think so? That sounds odd. I do know he is a damned fine player and has posted some interesting comments here so this isn't a knock on him. I just find it interesting that he admits to being rude and then says "I don't care." which reinforces this idea which you say is erroneous.
As for myself I try to extend courtesy to all, but I will speak my mind. If you think that is rude so be it. I will say this: People can be 'nice' and have evil agendas and people can be nasty and still be of a benevolent mindset, so rudeness is not the be all indicator of good and evil. (Thank goodness.) On the other hand if rude behavior is because of poor values then well may be it is a symptom of a larger problem.
Also I would say your perspective is a bit funny. If someone complains about someone else's behavior in a game (such as magic online) this does not indicate that they don't know what real problems are. I mean I don't know a single person irl who doesn't have real problems. That is the nature of life. Saying that rude behavior in a game should be tolerated because it isn't on the same scale as say losing a best friend, family member to cancer/accidents etc is just silly.
Rudeness is a societal concept. If you show up a half-hour late to dinner in one society it might be considered rude, whereas in another it might be considered polite. Rudeness is not intrinsic to the act, but rather the cultural expectations. So, for now, if (big 'if') a majority of the MTGO people consider an action rude, that kind of makes it rude by definition. It doesn't matter if you consider yourself enlightened and above a seemingly stupid expectation. Of course, as things stand, their only power is to shun what they consider rude players, meanwhile lobbying to WotC for further action. In the meantime, the activity in question and the labelling of the activity as rude will persist.
One other aspect of good manners though. Even if you know an activity will strike some people as rude, but you think it is not, if you can reasonably get by without doing that activity, it would be considerate of others to avoid it. Consideration of others is a fine quality of a gentleman, and even sacrificing truth to this aspect of charity is often worthwhile. I hold that up as an ideal, although I know not everyone will do so.
Anyways, please forgive my slow play - it's not due to playing multiple events, but rather that I am slow and stupid in coming up with my decisions for a given play sequence.
Playing in multiple events is rude???
You guys serious? Who the F$%# are you to tell me what i may do in events with timers? Like really i wish WotC would impose a cap on some of the ideas poeple spew out of their mouths. You have your TIMER i have mine. There is no rule,clause,law etc stating that i must click the "ok" button. If i do not then i lose and you lost some time(heaven forbid an extra 10 mins)-you guys need some RL problems, This is a joke-
If the timer does not expire, i am within my rights to play in as many as i damm well please. And if my timer does expire, well you just won a round! Gross topic.
The person whom compared driving while on the phone to playing in many events at once, is not the same at all. One is a dangerous task which can not be, in most cases performed by say an 8 year old. That and It is not the talking, rather it is the handling of the moblie device hence hands free phones-headsets- are legal while driving.
Polymorph and Summoning Trap.dek does look promising in RoE that and Jund has to rotate sometime.
Oh and Dunkle is not rude(actually one of the nicest people online whom is also a really good card slinger), Pual, you are;p.
Playing in more than one event at a time is analagous to driving and talking on your cellphone at the same time. You may think you can concentrate on both tasks, but you really cannot fully concentrate on either.
there was an article on starcity about how polymorph could be a much better deck in std once RoE is online, I'm sure people probably saw that as an opportunity, tho a stupid one since it's reprinted in so many sets I can't imagine it ever being a money card
Dunno...I got 4. On the advice of Mr Impy I might add. There are plenty in the story though. 38 or so between 3 sets. It was just the way cheap ones that disappeared I think.
Where all the Polymorphs at? Almost like someone's been buying a lot of them, more than one would ever need, with the idea that it would suddenly shoot up in price.
Anyone, uh...know anything about that?
Some people are rude but would prefer not to openly admit it or be called on it.
arent rude and not caring fairly redundant??
In other words you ARE rude and don't care. An interesting admission.
I like playing 2 or even 3 events at once. I don't feel a difference in concentration between 1 and 2 events, though 3 simultanous are really hard work. And yeah, I don't care if people think Im rude as Im usually fast enough to end it in time. Plus, I play fast decks.
Multi-tabling on Magic Online is incredibly rude, and I wish Wizards would impose a cap of one sanctioned event at a time.
"Hey, other people in this event! I'm going to deliberately waste your time and I don't give a crap! Here, stare at this image of an extended middle finger while I play in another game for a bit!"